Taylorsville vs Kearns

Taylorsville and Kearns on the published weights — then move the weights to yours and see whether the result survives.

68B−

C60

Taylorsville ahead by 8Editorial weights

Category by category

DHousingD+

Kearns +4 pts

—Schools—

not comparable yet

B+Cost of livingB−

Taylorsville +10 pts

B+CommuteC

Taylorsville +18 pts

A−AmenitiesB

Taylorsville +9 pts

C−EmploymentD

Taylorsville +7 pts

—Residents—

not comparable yet

Weigh it yourself

The published weights are an editorial judgement, not a fact. Drag them. Both totals recompute live and the bar above moves with them.

Housing & affordability18%Schools18%Cost of living14%Commute & transport14%Amenities12%Employment & income12%Residents12%

Weights total 100% · normalised to 100% before scoring, so you can be sloppy.

The numbers side by side

$434kMedian home value$374k

$1,482Median rent$1,744

22.2 minMean commute25.7 min

$86kMedian household income$87k

0.58%Effective property tax0.57%

—Within-state proficiency—

116Restaurants & cafés45

58,678Population37,696

0Resident responses0

Bold marks the better figure on that row. ACS 2020–24 · OpenStreetMap Sep 2026.