Farmington Hills vs Farmington

Farmington Hills and Farmington on the published weights — then move the weights to yours and see whether the result survives.

68B−

B−69

Farmington ahead by 1Editorial weights

Category by category

C+HousingC

Farmington Hills +5 pts

BSchoolsB

Farmington +1 pts

CCost of livingC+

Farmington +7 pts

B−CommuteB

Farmington +6 pts

B+AmenitiesB

Farmington Hills +3 pts

C+EmploymentC+

Farmington +4 pts

—Residents—

not comparable yet

Weigh it yourself

The published weights are an editorial judgement, not a fact. Drag them. Both totals recompute live and the bar above moves with them.

Housing & affordability18%Schools18%Cost of living14%Commute & transport14%Amenities12%Employment & income12%Residents12%

Weights total 100% · normalised to 100% before scoring, so you can be sloppy.

The numbers side by side

$355kMedian home value$297k

$1,551Median rent$1,340

24.7 minMean commute23.1 min

$105kMedian household income$98k

1.52%Effective property tax1.60%

80th pctWithin-state proficiency82nd pct

71Restaurants & cafés68

83,515Population11,504

0Resident responses0

Bold marks the better figure on that row. ACS 2020–24 · EDFacts SY2021–22 · OpenStreetMap Sep 2026.