Clovis vs Sanger

Clovis and Sanger on the published weights — then move the weights to yours and see whether the result survives.

64C+

D+52

Clovis ahead by 12Editorial weights

Category by category

CHousingD

Clovis +16 pts

B−SchoolsC−

Clovis +15 pts

C−Cost of livingB

Sanger +17 pts

C+CommuteC−

Clovis +11 pts

B+AmenitiesC−

Clovis +25 pts

C−EmploymentF

Clovis +26 pts

—Residents—

not comparable yet

Weigh it yourself

The published weights are an editorial judgement, not a fact. Drag them. Both totals recompute live and the bar above moves with them.

Housing & affordability18%Schools18%Cost of living14%Commute & transport14%Amenities12%Employment & income12%Residents12%

Weights total 100% · normalised to 100% before scoring, so you can be sloppy.

The numbers side by side

$483kMedian home value$365k

$1,792Median rent$1,209

23.6 minMean commute23.5 min

$99kMedian household income$78k

0.84%Effective property tax0.78%

83rd pctWithin-state proficiency58th pct

64Restaurants & cafés28

124,725Population26,699

0Resident responses0

Bold marks the better figure on that row. ACS 2020–24 · EDFacts SY2021–22 · OpenStreetMap Sep 2026.