Cedar Park vs Brushy Creek

Cedar Park and Brushy Creek on the published weights — then move the weights to yours and see whether the result survives.

69B−

C+67

Cedar Park ahead by 2Editorial weights

Category by category

C−HousingC+

Brushy Creek +9 pts

A−SchoolsA−

Cedar Park +2 pts

CCost of livingC−

Cedar Park +4 pts

C+CommuteB−

Brushy Creek +3 pts

A−AmenitiesD+

Cedar Park +32 pts

B−EmploymentB

Brushy Creek +9 pts

—Residents—

not comparable yet

Weigh it yourself

The published weights are an editorial judgement, not a fact. Drag them. Both totals recompute live and the bar above moves with them.

Housing & affordability18%Schools18%Cost of living14%Commute & transport14%Amenities12%Employment & income12%Residents12%

Weights total 100% · normalised to 100% before scoring, so you can be sloppy.

The numbers side by side

$514kMedian home value$499k

$1,846Median rent$2,127

25.5 minMean commute24.2 min

$130kMedian household income$139k

1.59%Effective property tax1.39%

84th pctWithin-state proficiency88th pct

116Restaurants & cafés12

78,301Population19,576

0Resident responses0

Bold marks the better figure on that row. ACS 2020–24 · EDFacts SY2021–22 · OpenStreetMap Sep 2026.